News 
 National News 
 National 
 General 
 Labor loses slender lead on crucial two-party vote 

Labor loses slender lead on crucial two-party vote

31 Aug, 2010 11:10 AM
Labor has lost its hold on the national two-party preferred vote, one of the key elements Julia Gillard has relied on to argue her party has the better right to form a minority government.

Late last night, Labor's two-party lead had dramatically turned into a deficit of about 1900 votes - with nearly 10.7 million counted.

The Coalition now leads on both the primary and two-party vote.

Last week, when Labor held a healthy lead in the popular vote, Ms Gillard argued this gave her party superiority in the quest to form government.

The Australian Electoral Commission figures are constantly changing, and the latest fluctuation came after the commission removed eight seats from the two-party tally on the basis that neither of the major parties were not both in first and second position.

One of the four independents holding the nation's future in his hands condemned both the main parties as he warned he might not support either when he announces his decision in coming days.

Andrew Wilkie, the Tasmanian independent who met Julia Gillard and Tony Abbott yesterday, decried both parties as one of Ms Gillard's signature claims to retaining power - a superior two-party-preferred vote - disappeared.

Mr Wilkie released a list of 20 ''priorities'' that would cost billions of dollars to implement and said both parties had to do more to win his support.

''I note that in the last few months, the Labor government has been neither stable, competent or ethical, and I'm yet to be persuaded that the opposition can do any better,'' he said.

Both sides consider Mr Wilkie crucial in generating momentum because he will decide as early as tomorrow, while the other three - Tony Windsor, Bob Katter and Rob Oakeshott - will not decide until the end of the week at the earliest.

Last night the rural trio met Ms Gillard and Mr Abbott.

Ms Gillard, who will make another public pitch today at the National Press Club, presented them with Labor's plan to reform Parliament and crack down on political donations and advertising, as they requested.

With negotiations reaching the critical stage, demands flowed thick and fast.

The West Australian National Tony Crook stressed he was independent and not part of the Coalition. He attended a Nationals party room meeting in Canberra and, in return for his support, demanded $860 million in royalties be funnelled to WA each year, plus more GST revenue.

Without Mr Crook's support, Mr Abbott's Coalition can lay claim to only 72 seats.

The Green, Adam Bandt, has pledged to support Labor, giving it 73 seats. A majority of 76 is needed.

Mr Wilkie said renovations to Royal Hobart Hospital and betting limits on poker machines were his main demands. He said both leaders had been ''receptive''. He said a humane asylum-seeker policy was paramount. He said he did not like the Liberals' hardline policy approach and Labor's was not much better.

His priority list, which he stressed were not demands, included infrastructure projects for Tasmania, worth an estimated $2 billion, increased pensions and other welfare payments, a publicly funded dental scheme and a conscience vote on gay marriage.

The Nationals, who have been shut out of negotiations with the independents, flexed their muscles by holding a party room meeting to show off their 12 MPs and six senators, an increase of four in total.

The relationships between the Nationals and the independents, especially Mr Katter, are poisonous but the Nationals leader, Warren Truss, believed this to be surmountable for the good of the nation.

Phillip Coorey is the chief political correspondent for The Sydney Morning Herald.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
The latest count actually has Labor with a slender lead BUT the electoral commission is excluding the votes from 8 electorates, our own (Armidale) included! So what does this count mean if it is not counting ALL the votes. It means nothing that's what.
Posted by Captain Col, 31/08/2010 4:10:10 PM
Either they count all the votes or this result means nothing. How can you have a 2 party preferred result when you dont count some peoples vote? I for one am incensed that they are not counting my vote and I expect that every voter in the New England electorate would feel exactly the same. What is this sham 2PP count?
Posted by Peter piper, 31/08/2010 7:30:49 PM
The expression on Gillard's face in editorial photo it seems she is really going to get into Latham the next time she see's him. It was irresponsible of him to advise on 60 Minutes to make a blank vote. And those 'blank' votes would have been the large marjority of people who are hurt in Rudd being kooeed.
Posted by Eunice, 1/09/2010 1:40:10 AM
..yet another public pitch at the National Press Club, one could be mistaken for this loooking like a deperate Labor leader.
Posted by hawker, 1/09/2010 7:50:48 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
12 August, 2010
11 August, 2010
20 August, 2010
26 August, 2010
23 August, 2010
POLL
Q: Should the independents take as long as they need to make a decision on forming a minority government?

Yes, it's far too important to rush.
(44.7%)

No, uncertainity is affecting the economy.
(55.3%)

Total Votes: 1913
Poll Date: 31 August, 2010
BLOGS
25 August, 2010
23 August, 2010
26 August, 2010
31 August, 2010
27 August, 2010

Most popular articles




Maribyrnong Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...