News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Report scuttles Take-a-Break cash 

Report scuttles Take-a-Break cash

25 Jan, 2012 01:00 AM
THE final nail appears to have been hammered into the coffin of the Take-a-Break childcare program.

The program has been caught up in months of bickering between the state and federal governments over who should provide funding.

The state government released an independent report on Friday recommending the program be dissolved and its funding diverted.

The KPMG report found that the program's "social benefit exceeds social cost".

But it also cited problems with the program including trouble meeting its aim of short-term care at late notice.

The report suggests funding instead be shifted to the underused Adult Community and Further Education (ACFE) subsidy, assisting parents with child care while undertaking education and training.

Children and Early Childhood Development Minister Wendy Lovell said the program was being inappropriately used to address gaps in general childcare services.

Jamila Rizvi, a spokeswoman for federal Early Childhood and Childcare Minister Kate Ellis, said the Baillieu government should stop misleading families and follow the lead of other states in committing funding for this type of child care.

"The federal government also funds an unlimited number of childcare places in Victoria in long day care, family day care and outside school-hours care so existing childcare services can expand and new services can be created," Ms Rizvi said.

Opposition Children and Young Adults spokeswoman Jenny Mikakos said the report offered a flimsy excuse to refuse funding.

Ms Mikakos said the KPMG report also outlined strengths, including a safe and welcoming environment, health benefits and reduced social isolation. "For Ms Lovell to now rubbish this program when she has spent the past nine months calling on the Commonwealth to fund it smacks of hypocrisy."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
According to both KPMG and the Productivity Commission reports, Occasional Care was meant to provide low cost, short-term on-call child care, which the Productivity Commission described as more child minding than educational in nature,and was intended to assist disadvantaged groups. It got hijacked by the middle class demanding permanent bookings at a cost that under-cut providers of quality Long Day Care, and denied the intended more crisis prone users of access to care when needed. If families want permanently booked cheap lesser quality child care,neither government will fund it.
Posted by futurist, 30/01/2012 7:11:04 PM, on Maribyrnong Weekly

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles




Maribyrnong Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...